FlightLogic is an independent, advertising-supported information service that lets you compare airlines, airports, hotels, and travel products. We do not provide financial advice and we do not recommend specific products or providers. Links marked * are advertising links and may earn us commission at no extra cost to you — always read the terms of any product before booking or applying. Learn more about how we make money.
Advertiser disclosure — how this service works
FlightLogic is an independent, advertising-supported information service that lets you compare airlines, airports, hotels, and travel products. We do not provide financial advice and we do not recommend specific products or providers. Links marked * are advertising links and may earn us commission at no extra cost to you — always read the terms of any product before booking or applying. Learn more about how we make money.
Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport vs Los Angeles International Airport
Detailed comparison of BOM and LAX on FlightLogic scores and passenger experience.
Verdict
Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport (BOM) scores higher overall at 7.7/10 versus Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) at 7.0/10. Los Angeles International Airport leads on lounges at 8.0/10.
2 terminals (T2 international integrated) · 52M+ passengers/year
7.7/ 10
How good is Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport?
Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport (BOM) scores 7.7/10 (Very Good)
on FlightLogic's airport index — combining on-time performance (7.3),
passenger experience (7.6), and facilities (8.0).
Lounge quality rates 7.9/10. See full airport guide →
In short
Mumbai BOM scores 7.7/10 — UK–West India hub. T2 international. Compare /airports/delhi for North India. See /guides/uk-india-flights-guide-2026 and /guides/mumbai-airport-lounge-guide-2026.
FlightLogic Score7.7Very Good
On-time7.3Departure reliability
Experience7.6Staff, queues, cleanliness
Facilities8.0Food, shops, seating
Lounges7.9Lounge quality
Rating basisEditorialFlightLogic methodology
Score breakdown
Modelled on industry airport indices — on-time data, facilities ratings, and editorial experience signals combined into a single FlightLogic score.
On-Time Performance
7.3
Passenger Experience
7.6
Facilities & Comfort
8.0
Lounge score7.9/10
Highlights
Primary UK–West India gateway — Maharashtra, Gujarat, Goa connections
BA and Air India direct LHR–BOM; Qatar, Emirates, Etihad one-stop competitive on price
Monsoon season (Jun–Sep) can disrupt schedules — build buffer time
Overview
India's financial capital gateway — BA and Air India direct from Heathrow plus dense Gulf hub connections for UK–West India VFR traffic.
UK VFR routing
Mumbai handles the largest share of UK–India business and VFR traffic to western states. Gulf hub connections via DOH and DXB often beat direct fares in business class off-peak.
Allow 90+ min for T2 immigration at peak arrival banks — UK passport holders eligible for e-Visa or visa on arrival depending on nationality.
Los Angeles, United States · LAX · #2 in this comparison
9 terminals (Tom Bradley International + T1–T8) · 75M+ passengers/year
7.0/ 10
How good is Los Angeles International Airport?
Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) scores 7.0/10 (Very Good)
on FlightLogic's airport index — combining on-time performance (6.9),
passenger experience (6.8), and facilities (7.5).
Lounge quality rates 8.0/10. See full airport guide →
In short
Los Angeles LAX is rated 7.0/10 on FlightLogic with lounge score 8.0/10. Most long-haul UK and Asia routes use Tom Bradley International (TBIT) with alliance and airline lounges. Terminal-specific access applies — allow 2+ hours for international departures. The LAX People Mover connects terminals landside.
FlightLogic Score7.0Very Good
On-time6.9Departure reliability
Experience6.8Staff, queues, cleanliness
Facilities7.5Food, shops, seating
Lounges8.0Lounge quality
Rating basisEditorialFlightLogic methodology
Score breakdown
Modelled on industry airport indices — on-time data, facilities ratings, and editorial experience signals combined into a single FlightLogic score.
On-Time Performance
6.9
Passenger Experience
6.8
Facilities & Comfort
7.5
Lounge score8.0/10
Highlights
Tom Bradley International Terminal (Terminal B) consolidates most international departures and premium lounges
Star Alliance, Oneworld, and SkyTeam each operate large alliance lounges in TBIT
LAX People Mover (automated train) links terminals landside — plan time for terminal changes
Strong Asia-Pacific and transatlantic connectivity; congestion peaks on Sunday evening international banks
Overview
West Coast US gateway with the Tom Bradley International Terminal (TBIT) hosting most long-haul lounges and ongoing terminal modernisation.
Tom Bradley and international lounges
Most UK and long-haul passengers use Tom Bradley International Terminal, where Star Alliance, Oneworld, and SkyTeam operate large shared lounges plus airline-specific clubs (Qantas, Cathay Pacific partner access via Oneworld, etc.).
Amex Centurion Lounge at LAX is in the international terminal area — verify terminal assignment on your ticket before planning lounge time.
FAQ
Which is better, Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport or Los Angeles International Airport?
Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport (BOM) scores higher overall at 7.7/10 versus Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) at 7.0/10. Los Angeles International Airport leads on lounges at 8.0/10.
Which has better lounges, BOM or LAX?
Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) scores higher for lounges at 8.0/10, versus Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport at 7.9/10.
Which airport is more on-time, BOM or LAX?
Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport (BOM) has stronger on-time performance at 7.3/10 versus Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) at 6.9/10.
Cookies on FlightLogic.
We use one optional Google Analytics cookie to understand how the site is used.
No analytics runs unless you accept. Essential settings (like this choice and your
theme) are stored on your device only.
Cookie details