FlightLogic is an independent, advertising-supported information service that lets you compare airlines, airports, hotels, and travel products. We do not provide financial advice and we do not recommend specific products or providers. Links marked * are advertising links and may earn us commission at no extra cost to you — always read the terms of any product before booking or applying. Learn more about how we make money.
Advertiser disclosure — how this service works
FlightLogic is an independent, advertising-supported information service that lets you compare airlines, airports, hotels, and travel products. We do not provide financial advice and we do not recommend specific products or providers. Links marked * are advertising links and may earn us commission at no extra cost to you — always read the terms of any product before booking or applying. Learn more about how we make money.
Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport vs San Francisco International Airport
Detailed comparison of SYD and SFO on FlightLogic scores and passenger experience.
Verdict
Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport (SYD) scores higher overall at 8.3/10 versus San Francisco International Airport (SFO) at 7.8/10.
Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport (SYD) scores 8.3/10 (Excellent)
on FlightLogic's airport index — combining on-time performance (8.1),
passenger experience (8.2), and facilities (8.6).
Lounge quality rates 8.8/10. See full airport guide →
In short
Sydney SYD is rated 8.3/10 on FlightLogic with lounge score 8.8/10. International flights use Terminal 1 — Qantas First Lounge is the premium benchmark. Allow 60+ minutes for arrival biosecurity. See /guides/sydney-airport-lounge-guide-2026 and /reviews/qantas-first-lounge-sydney-review.
FlightLogic Score8.3Excellent
On-time8.1Departure reliability
Experience8.2Staff, queues, cleanliness
Facilities8.6Food, shops, seating
Lounges8.8Lounge quality
Rating basisEditorialFlightLogic methodology
Score breakdown
Modelled on industry airport indices — on-time data, facilities ratings, and editorial experience signals combined into a single FlightLogic score.
On-Time Performance
8.1
Passenger Experience
8.2
Facilities & Comfort
8.6
Lounge score8.8/10
Highlights
Terminal 1 handles all international traffic — Qantas First Lounge and Business Lounge are flagship products
Efficient customs and biosecurity — allow time for arrival processing on inbound UK flights
Domestic connections require terminal transfer (T1→T2/T3) with re-security
Strong Qantas and Oneworld hub for UK–Australia routings via Singapore or direct
Overview
Australia's primary international gateway — Qantas First Lounge and Oneworld partners in Terminal 1 for long-haul arrivals.
Terminal 1 international
All international arrivals and departures use Terminal 1. Qantas operates separate First and Business lounges with Neil Perry dining in the First Lounge.
Oneworld partners use Qantas lounges or the shared Oneworld lounge depending on tier and operating carrier.
San Francisco, United States · SFO · #2 in this comparison
4 terminals (T1–T3 domestic, International Terminal A & G) · 50M+ passengers/year
7.8/ 10
How good is San Francisco International Airport?
San Francisco International Airport (SFO) scores 7.8/10 (Very Good)
on FlightLogic's airport index — combining on-time performance (7.5),
passenger experience (7.7), and facilities (8.2).
Lounge quality rates 8.3/10. See full airport guide →
In short
San Francisco SFO is rated 7.8/10 on FlightLogic with lounge score 8.3/10. United Polaris Lounge in International Terminal G is the premium benchmark for transpacific business class. Centurion Lounge in Terminal 3 serves domestic and some international cardholders. See /guides/sfo-airport-lounge-guide-2026.
FlightLogic Score7.8Very Good
On-time7.5Departure reliability
Experience7.7Staff, queues, cleanliness
Facilities8.2Food, shops, seating
Lounges8.3Lounge quality
Rating basisEditorialFlightLogic methodology
Score breakdown
Modelled on industry airport indices — on-time data, facilities ratings, and editorial experience signals combined into a single FlightLogic score.
On-Time Performance
7.5
Passenger Experience
7.7
Facilities & Comfort
8.2
Lounge score8.3/10
Highlights
United Polaris Lounge in International Terminal G — among the best US airline lounges for transpacific departures
International Terminal A and G host Star Alliance, oneworld, and Centurion Lounge for long-haul passengers
BART train to downtown San Francisco in 30 minutes — preferred over LAX for city access on business trips
Common UK routing via London with BA, Virgin Atlantic, and United non-stops
Overview
West Coast tech gateway — United Polaris hub with strong Asia-Pacific routes and renovated International Terminal lounges.
International Terminal and Polaris
International Terminal G hosts United Polaris Lounge for United long-haul business class and Star Alliance Gold on international departures. Terminal A serves other Star Alliance and oneworld long-haul carriers with alliance lounges.
Airside connections exist between International Terminal A and G — easier than JFK for Star Alliance connections.
FAQ
Which is better, Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport or San Francisco International Airport?
Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport (SYD) scores higher overall at 8.3/10 versus San Francisco International Airport (SFO) at 7.8/10.
Which has better lounges, SYD or SFO?
Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport (SYD) scores higher for lounges at 8.8/10, versus San Francisco International Airport at 8.3/10.
Which airport is more on-time, SYD or SFO?
Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport (SYD) has stronger on-time performance at 8.1/10 versus San Francisco International Airport (SFO) at 7.5/10.
Cookies on FlightLogic.
We use one optional Google Analytics cookie to understand how the site is used.
No analytics runs unless you accept. Essential settings (like this choice and your
theme) are stored on your device only.
Cookie details