FlightLogic is an independent, advertising-supported information service that lets you compare airlines, airports, hotels, and travel products. We do not provide financial advice and we do not recommend specific products or providers. Links marked * are advertising links and may earn us commission at no extra cost to you — always read the terms of any product before booking or applying. Learn more about how we make money.
Advertiser disclosure — how this service works
FlightLogic is an independent, advertising-supported information service that lets you compare airlines, airports, hotels, and travel products. We do not provide financial advice and we do not recommend specific products or providers. Links marked * are advertising links and may earn us commission at no extra cost to you — always read the terms of any product before booking or applying. Learn more about how we make money.
Amsterdam Schiphol Airport vs San Francisco International Airport
Detailed comparison of AMS and SFO on FlightLogic scores and passenger experience.
Verdict
Amsterdam Schiphol Airport (AMS) scores higher overall at 8.6/10 versus San Francisco International Airport (SFO) at 7.8/10.
Amsterdam Schiphol Airport (AMS) scores 8.6/10 (Excellent)
on FlightLogic's airport index — combining on-time performance (8.4),
passenger experience (8.5), and facilities (8.9).
Lounge quality rates 8.7/10. See full airport guide →
In short
Amsterdam Schiphol (AMS) is rated 8.6/10 on FlightLogic — one of Europe's highest-scoring hubs. Single-terminal layout, lounge score 8.7/10, and efficient Schengen transfers. KLM Crown Lounge serves business and SkyTeam elites. See /guides/ams-schiphol-lounge-guide-2026 and /reviews/klm-crown-lounge-ams-review.
FlightLogic Score8.6Excellent
On-time8.4Departure reliability
Experience8.5Staff, queues, cleanliness
Facilities8.9Food, shops, seating
Lounges8.7Lounge quality
Rating basisEditorialFlightLogic methodology
Score breakdown
Modelled on industry airport indices — on-time data, facilities ratings, and editorial experience signals combined into a single FlightLogic score.
On-Time Performance
8.4
Passenger Experience
8.5
Facilities & Comfort
8.9
Lounge score8.7/10
Highlights
Single-terminal design simplifies connections — most gates are reachable airside within 15–25 minutes
KLM Crown Lounge and Aspire lounges for business and elite passengers
Rijksmuseum annex and library in the terminal — unique cultural amenities
Among Europe's best connection hubs for UK travellers routing to Africa, Asia, and the Americas via KLM/Delta
Overview
KLM and SkyTeam hub with a single-terminal design, excellent Schengen connections, and the Crown Lounge for premium passengers.
Single-terminal efficiency
Unlike Heathrow or JFK, Schiphol uses one terminal building with pier-based gates — connections rarely require changing buildings, though long walks between distant piers are common on short connections.
The KLM Crown Lounge near the D/E pier intersection is the flagship premium space for SkyTeam business passengers and elites.
San Francisco, United States · SFO · #2 in this comparison
4 terminals (T1–T3 domestic, International Terminal A & G) · 50M+ passengers/year
7.8/ 10
How good is San Francisco International Airport?
San Francisco International Airport (SFO) scores 7.8/10 (Very Good)
on FlightLogic's airport index — combining on-time performance (7.5),
passenger experience (7.7), and facilities (8.2).
Lounge quality rates 8.3/10. See full airport guide →
In short
San Francisco SFO is rated 7.8/10 on FlightLogic with lounge score 8.3/10. United Polaris Lounge in International Terminal G is the premium benchmark for transpacific business class. Centurion Lounge in Terminal 3 serves domestic and some international cardholders. See /guides/sfo-airport-lounge-guide-2026.
FlightLogic Score7.8Very Good
On-time7.5Departure reliability
Experience7.7Staff, queues, cleanliness
Facilities8.2Food, shops, seating
Lounges8.3Lounge quality
Rating basisEditorialFlightLogic methodology
Score breakdown
Modelled on industry airport indices — on-time data, facilities ratings, and editorial experience signals combined into a single FlightLogic score.
On-Time Performance
7.5
Passenger Experience
7.7
Facilities & Comfort
8.2
Lounge score8.3/10
Highlights
United Polaris Lounge in International Terminal G — among the best US airline lounges for transpacific departures
International Terminal A and G host Star Alliance, oneworld, and Centurion Lounge for long-haul passengers
BART train to downtown San Francisco in 30 minutes — preferred over LAX for city access on business trips
Common UK routing via London with BA, Virgin Atlantic, and United non-stops
Overview
West Coast tech gateway — United Polaris hub with strong Asia-Pacific routes and renovated International Terminal lounges.
International Terminal and Polaris
International Terminal G hosts United Polaris Lounge for United long-haul business class and Star Alliance Gold on international departures. Terminal A serves other Star Alliance and oneworld long-haul carriers with alliance lounges.
Airside connections exist between International Terminal A and G — easier than JFK for Star Alliance connections.
FAQ
Which is better, Amsterdam Schiphol Airport or San Francisco International Airport?
Amsterdam Schiphol Airport (AMS) scores higher overall at 8.6/10 versus San Francisco International Airport (SFO) at 7.8/10.
Which has better lounges, AMS or SFO?
Amsterdam Schiphol Airport (AMS) scores higher for lounges at 8.7/10, versus San Francisco International Airport at 8.3/10.
Which airport is more on-time, AMS or SFO?
Amsterdam Schiphol Airport (AMS) has stronger on-time performance at 8.4/10 versus San Francisco International Airport (SFO) at 7.5/10.
Cookies on FlightLogic.
We use one optional Google Analytics cookie to understand how the site is used.
No analytics runs unless you accept. Essential settings (like this choice and your
theme) are stored on your device only.
Cookie details